Allometry- Body
size relationships of ungulate resource division:
A review of how morphology shapes: 1) Ungulate species distribution
limitations during winter months and 2) Food selection in the Yellowstone
region.
I.
Limitations on ungulate species winter distributions:
* Morphology constraint: Smaller stature animals are not
able to deal with deep snow like larger stature animals can. Animal
chest height and foot loads are measures that determine an animal's
ability to cope with snow depth and density. Foot load is: live
wt / area of all hooves to dewclaws. Increasing chest height and
decreasing foot loading determine relative ability to withstand
snow conditions.
Ungulate Species
|
Chest Height
(male)
|
Foot Load
|
Elk
|
83 cm
|
550 g/cm²
|
Moose
|
120 cm
|
490 g/cm²
|
Bighorn sheep
|
58 cm
|
500 g/cm²
|
Bison
|
73 cm
|
900 g/cm²
|
Pronghorn
|
50 cm
|
600 g/cm²
|
Mule Deer
|
58 cm
|
360 g/cm²
|
II.
Food Selection during winter months:
*Metabolic needs: Smaller animals, such as pronghorn and deer, need higher
quality forage per unit body weight, than larger grazers, such as
elk and bison. Forage is considered to have higher quality if it
is high in crude protein. Large grazers more efficiently utilize
large quantities of low quality food (ruminant animals), such as
found on winter range grasslands. The proportion of grass in winter
diet declines with ungulate body size. This means, larger grazers
(elk and bison) are unselective, eating relatively
high proportions of grass, as opposed to small selective
mixed feeders (pronghorn, bighorn sheep and mule deer), which consume
a relatively low proportion of grass during winter.
- Relative narrowing of the face in conjunction with body size, are two measures
that determine forage selectivity in ungulate species.
Ungulate Species
|
Female Live Wt. (kg)
|
Rel. Narrowing of Face
|
Deer
|
50kg
|
3.25
|
Pronghorn
|
45kg
|
2.7
|
Bighorn Sheep
|
54kg
|
2.55
|
Elk
|
220kg
|
2.4
|
Bison
|
450kg
|
1.6
|
|